
As an undergraduate I "grew up" with the radical theology of James Cone. I dug Cornel West in the
Matrix movies, too. So I was looking forward to their conversation here at the
American Academy of Religion meeting in Montreal. But what did I get? Giggling, middle-aged, pants suit and pashmina wearing bourgeois scholars and the construction of an ethno-centric hagiographic liberal geneology.
In his introductory remarks, West described Cone as "single handedly responsible" for a revolution in theology. He also went out of his way to point out that Cone had written two books of "liberation theology" two years before Gustavo Gutierrez in South America did. He then proudly claimed liberation theology for the USA before amending that - since we're in Canada - to "North America". The thing is, though, West played right into the criticisms of bourgeois theology that Gutierrez outlines in his work (I think it's his book
The Power of the Poor in History but I might be wrong). Gutierrez writes that the obsession amongst some theologians and scholars with the origins of liberation theology and the question of who "invented" it is tied up with the question of ownership and authority. The idea of being able to say that you own your own theology, GuGu joked, parallels the middle class obsession with being able to claim that you own your own house. This is obviously a world away from any genuinely radical theology.
If Cone was really the "grand" Christian figure that West was anointing him as, I would have expected that he would have rejected all the trite, bourgeois platitudes offered. Would he not also reject attempts to make his work acceptable to the banality of the liberal bourgeois academic establishment? I would have thought so, but I guess I was wrong.
Cone's narration of a largely sentimental self-hagiography and construction, with West, of essentially a liberal ethnocentric genealogy of US American Black theology was all the sadder to listen to because its teleological sting comes when the wealthy white folk - all those Professors who subtly insist on being addressed as such on their six-figure salaries - smile affectionately and applaud politely the depoliticised political
bons mots.

When Cornel West talked about reading Cone's first book
Black Theology and Black Power outside of the Black Panther headquarters all those Professors who subtly insist on being addressed as such on their six-figure salaries sitting around me
laughed. They fucking
laughed. The tradition of militant working class Black politics in the USA that reached its height with the Black Panthers is safe for the establishment now. And so are you, James Cone. The establishment knows it.
That's why they
laugh.
Cone can say that "the truth is always one sided." Cone can say that "the truth always upsets people." But when Cone said that he's been "fuming for forty years", and when Cornel West speaks of reading Cone's books with the Black Panthers, it makes the bourgeoisie laugh. And when James Cone says that we should "cross boundaries of class" and does not say that we should
eliminate class, it makes me want to leave the room and go explore the underground malls of Montreal.